Question on Intake Manifold Plenum Design

Engine, ignition, fuel, cooling, exhaust

Moderators: Ranchero50, DuckRyder

Post Reply
User avatar
colnago
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1882
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 8:48 pm
Location: Ridgecrest, CA

Question on Intake Manifold Plenum Design

Post by colnago »

No, this isn't anything like my "bad intake" question. This is just out of curiosity.

I've noticed that many of the dual-plane designs have a bumpy or wavy bottom, but open plenums tend to be smooth on the bottom. I was just wondering why. Any ideas? Does it create turbulence for dual-plane, but it needs a smoother flow in a single-plane design?

Joseph
"Sugar", my 1967 Ford F250 2WD Camper Special, 352FE, Ford iron "T" Intake with 1405 Edelbrock, Duraspark II Ignition, C6 transmission, front disc brake conversion.
User avatar
Ranchero50
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 5799
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 7:02 pm
Location: Maryland, Hagerstown
Contact:

Re: Question on Intake Manifold Plenum Design

Post by Ranchero50 »

Due to energy pulses in the air stream caused by the intake valve closing, a longer intake path changes the resonance frequency to a lower pitch which increases the low end torque. There's a ton of engineering involved but you see it in industry on EFI intakes with really long runners and intake gate valves that select between long or short runners on some of the 4.6 liter's. With the advent of variable cam timing the engineers were able to get away from the dual runner intakes and still have similar (or better) results.

Download a free copy of the two stroke tuners handbook and read the sections on exhaust design. Fascinating stuff.
'70 F-350 CS Cummins 6BT 10klb truck 64k mile Bahama Blue

Contact me for CNC Dome Lamp Bezels and Ash Tray pulls.
Post Reply