More done on the 72'...

Post progress reports on your project truck(s)

Moderator: FORDification

Post Reply
User avatar
zakt
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 807
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 9:16 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Re: More done on the 72'...

Post by zakt »

that 4wd crossmember is really in there have tons of hours on grinding that out and tons more to do :doh:

Got my motor mounts for the 460 finally from autofab :thup:
http://www.autofab.com/

Image
1972 Ford F350 crewcab
Image
User avatar
elgemcdlf
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1855
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:04 pm
Location: Ringgold, GA

Re: More done on the 72'...

Post by elgemcdlf »

zakt wrote:that 4wd crossmember is really in there have tons of hours on grinding that out and tons more to do :doh:

Got my motor mounts for the 460 finally from autofab :thup:
http://www.autofab.com/

[ Image ]

That's why it is recommended to just get a 4x4 frame. If you are paying attention the crossmember is only part of the frame mods. As you can tell the frame is boxed pretty much at least back to the firewall.
User avatar
zakt
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 807
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 9:16 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Re: More done on the 72'...

Post by zakt »

That would be nice just to swap frames... :hd: with the crewcab there are some that have spliced frames Id just rather weld crossmembers etc than mess with the frame rail splicing (to each his own) :D
1972 Ford F350 crewcab
Image
User avatar
forrestbump
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2140
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 12:23 am
Location: California, Phelan

Re: More done on the 72'...

Post by forrestbump »

I think one BIG issue nobody is addressing is that zakt has an F350, LWB (8' Bed) Crew Cab. Ford did NOT produce an F350 4WD truck in any configuration during the Bump era. If you find one, it's a NAPCO or Marmon-Herrington conversion...NOT Factory! So there is NO SUCH THING as a Factory F350 4WD Frame, conversions only and isn't that exactly what zakt is doing, only BETTER?

I've seen the depth of the frame rails on zakt's truck and they are easily 2" to 3" deeper than an F250's frame...beefy comes to mind when describing his chassis. A much stronger foundation than an F250 chassis.

My hat's off to zakt for undertaking this project and the attention to detail that he's applying is amazing. Keep up the GREAT work and I really appreciate his detailed photographs and build updates!
1970, 2WD, F-250, C/S, Dual Tanks, 390 FE (of course), C6, Power Steering, Power Disc Brakes, Dana 60 3.73, Sky View Blue, Ranger XLT

1970, 2WD, F-250, C/S, A/C, Dual Tanks, 390 FE (again, of course), C6, Power Steering, Power Disc Brakes, Dana 60 3.73, Wimbledon White & Sky View Blue, Ranger (almost twin brothers!)

"One of the greatest discoveries a man makes, one of his great surprises, is to find he can do what he was afraid he couldn't do" - Henry Ford

Larry
User avatar
elgemcdlf
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1855
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:04 pm
Location: Ringgold, GA

Re: More done on the 72'...

Post by elgemcdlf »

Who wrote the rule that the frame had to come from a bump? If there are no 350 4x4's where did the 350 4x4 crossmember come from? From a 350 dent? If so why not use the dent frame? Why not use one from the 80's? 90's?, 00's?
smokey3215
New Member
New Member
Posts: 138
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 9:12 pm

Re: More done on the 72'...

Post by smokey3215 »

I am doing the same thing as zakt 2wd to 4wd cclb and i can tell you one thing the 72 frame is a much stouter frame than any of the newer ones. My superduty frames are puny compared to the 72s.
User avatar
averagef250
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 4387
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:58 am
Location: Oregon, Beavercreek

Re: More done on the 72'...

Post by averagef250 »

Just observations of mine from having a few dozen of these old trucks, mostly 250 4x4's and doing a few 2wd to 4x4 conversions including a 78 F-350 longbed crew (with highboy parts, just like Todd)-

The F-100 and F-250 2wd frames are a little anemic. The F-350 2wd frames from the 60's and 70's are a much, much stouter thing. The F-250 4x4 frame, the actual rails themselves, are probably 99% identicle to the F-350 2wd frame rails. The biggest differences being the holes in the frames where the steering boxes mount.

If you cut all the 2wd front crossmember and bracing out of an F-350 2wd like Todd has done the 4x4 stuff fits right in and works as it would if Ford had built it that way. It is a lot more wok than cutting and grafting the front of a 4x4 frame onto the crew longbed frame, but I think it's a safer route to go compared to the frame splice for most people.
1970 F-250 4x4 original Willock swivel frame chassis '93 5.9 Cummins/Getrag/NP205/HP60/D70
User avatar
elgemcdlf
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1855
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:04 pm
Location: Ringgold, GA

Re: More done on the 72'...

Post by elgemcdlf »

averagef250 wrote:...The F-250 4x4 frame, the actual rails themselves, are probably 99% identicle to the F-350 2wd frame rails. The biggest differences being the holes in the frames where the steering boxes mount...
So this makes the 250 frame a very usable. Steering box mount: the 4x4's have the box out front and 2WD is behind the axle. What is a 2WD 350? Behind the axle as with the lighter trucks? Which as long as we are on the subject of steering box you may want to think seriously about boxing with sleeves the portion of the frame the steering box mounts to. In a least the lighter trucks frame cracking at steering box mount points was/is fairly common. The 2WD trucks were mounted to a boxed section so I am assuming boxing the 4WD mount area would solve the problem.
User avatar
averagef250
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 4387
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:58 am
Location: Oregon, Beavercreek

Re: More done on the 72'...

Post by averagef250 »

I wasn't suggesting anyone use the 2wd box if that's what you're saying there? I was just stating the obvious difference between the BARE frame rails of an F-350 2wd frame and an F-250 4x4 frame. I've noticed many of the F-350 2wd frames even having the rivet holes for the 4x4 front crossmember and bracing!

The F-250 4x4 frames don't crack at the steering box mount, they aren't boxed in. If you retro a 78-79 F-250 4x4 box onto a highboy frame then boxing and standoffs should be self explanatory when you get to that point. Should be common sense that some thought and good welding should be used to hold the steering box in place.
1970 F-250 4x4 original Willock swivel frame chassis '93 5.9 Cummins/Getrag/NP205/HP60/D70
User avatar
Manny
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1190
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:15 pm
Location: Georgia, Lake City
Contact:

Re: More done on the 72'...

Post by Manny »

averagef250 wrote:I wasn't suggesting anyone use the 2wd box if that's what you're saying there? I was just stating the obvious difference between the BARE frame rails of an F-350 2wd frame and an F-250 4x4 frame. I've noticed many of the F-350 2wd frames even having the rivet holes for the 4x4 front crossmember and bracing!

The F-250 4x4 frames don't crack at the steering box mount, they aren't boxed in. If you retro a 78-79 F-250 4x4 box onto a highboy frame then boxing and standoffs should be self explanatory when you get to that point. Should be common sense that some thought and good welding should be used to hold the steering box in place.
Cool stuff Dustin nice to know that the highboy chassis are built on a good tough level with the 350's or similar....
Just another Ford fool named Dan.
The Junk that hangs around
67' F-250 highboy Camper special cross breed currently under way
http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... 22&t=86706
1974 Bronco 302 3 speed
1984 bronco 302 c6 35's
1994 F350 7.3 5spd dually.
woods wrote: The rust holes in my truck were a factory install (very rare).
User avatar
zakt
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 807
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 9:16 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Re: More done on the 72'...

Post by zakt »

all the welds ground down and onto cutting it apart, cant get it in the frame together... Ended up deciding to hand hacksaw the crossmemeber apart for the thinest cut with the least damage... doing the side pieces first might even have to cut the weld in the middle of the crossmember to get it into the frame from the front... :doh: Should be ready shortly to weld it all in after some sandblasting and drilling for the engine mounts....

Image
1972 Ford F350 crewcab
Image
User avatar
basketcase0302
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 6805
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 7:11 am
Location: Hawthorne, Florida

Re: More done on the 72'...

Post by basketcase0302 »

:thup: :pop: :clap:
Jeff
http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... 22&t=46251
SOLD-71 F-350 dually flatbed, 302 / .030 over V-8 with a "baby"C-6, B & M truckshifter, Dana70/4.11 ratio, intermittent wipers, tilt steering, full LED lighting on the flat bed, and no stereo yet (this way I can hear the rattles to diagnose)! SOLD!
Many Ford bumps / one 76' EB / and several dents through the years.
A lot of "oddball" Ford parts collected from working on them for 34 years now!
2008 Ford Escape 4 x 4
User avatar
zakt
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 807
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 9:16 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Re: More done on the 72'...

Post by zakt »

got my line on another 78 F250 front D60... guy says next week I can get it :woohoo: (hope this one works out)

Image
1972 Ford F350 crewcab
Image
User avatar
FormerMarine1981
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 793
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 10:28 pm
Location: Texas , Austin
Contact:

Re: More done on the 72'...

Post by FormerMarine1981 »

Sweet, can I get the guys, name, number and address. I want to call him and make sure You got a good deal.... :D


Hopefully this one works out for you man.
What we do in Life, Echoes in Eternity
User avatar
zakt
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 807
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 9:16 pm
Location: San Diego, California

Re: More done on the 72'...

Post by zakt »

Have both sides cut off the 68 crossmember and still cant get it in the frame looks like cut in half and slide in the front... as suspected. Might be a good thing though will sandblast all the parts before install (inside and out) then can actually even weld the side of the crossmember where I cut the side pieces off as you cant get to that when there on. Looks to be welded even from the factory from the out side with a tab sticking through and a plug weld on another tab.

Image
1972 Ford F350 crewcab
Image
Post Reply