3m 3.3M 3.5M ?

Clutch, transmission, rear axle

Moderators: FORDification, 70_F100

Post Reply
harpoon907
New Member
New Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 3:44 am

3m 3.3M 3.5M ?

Post by harpoon907 »

What does 3M 3.3M 3.5M measure or denote on my front axle?
fordman
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 22329
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Kansas, Ottawa
Contact:

Re: 3m 3.3M 3.5M ?

Post by fordman »

are all 3 symbols on there or just one of them? if its just one of them it could stand for the weight ratign of the front axle. here is a page that may help also. i will check out some ibeams in the morning and see what i can tell about them. http://www.fordification.com/Ibeamsspindles.htm http://www.fordification.com/str-susp_variations.htm
harpoon907
New Member
New Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 3:44 am

Re: 3m 3.3M 3.5M ?

Post by harpoon907 »

At the Fordification website I was trying to find the right exploded diagram of front axle parts for my 72 F250 4x4 and saw diagram options for 3M or 3.3M or 3.5M. Just curious what that codification means.
fordman
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 22329
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Kansas, Ottawa
Contact:

Re: 3m 3.3M 3.5M ?

Post by fordman »

ok i see that now. i think that has to do with hte weight ratign of the front axle. but i am unsure. but thats my best guess. unless someone else will stop in and give an opinion.
ka_jd7and1
New Member
New Member
Posts: 110
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 1:14 am
Location: Bakersfield, CA

Re: 3m 3.3M 3.5M ?

Post by ka_jd7and1 »

Sounds logical. Since M is the Roman numeral for a thousand, those would be 3000, 3300, and 3500.
03 Chevy S10 - the daily driver
68 Ford F100 longbed - the tow pig / TLC project
78 Chevy Impala - the race car

I'm sorry if I ask lots of questions, there's just a lot of stuff I don't know (yet).
Fordboy90
New Member
New Member
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 7:30 am

Re: 3m 3.3M 3.5M ?

Post by Fordboy90 »

I have a 1960 f100 and when I was doing research on my vin I found out that is came with a 3.3m rear end. Those numbers stand to what kind of rear end/ front end you have. Like 8.8 9" and so one. Hope that helps you some.
User avatar
70_F100
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2999
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 11:23 am
Location: North Carolina, Kernersville

Re: 3m 3.3M 3.5M ?

Post by 70_F100 »

fordman wrote: i think that has to do with hte weight ratign of the front axle.
That is correct, but it is also used for the weight rating for the rear axle.
ka_jd7and1 wrote:Sounds logical. Since M is the Roman numeral for a thousand, those would be 3000, 3300, and 3500.
That is also correct.
Fordboy90 wrote:I have a 1960 f100 and when I was doing research on my vin I found out that is came with a 3.3m rear end. Those numbers stand to what kind of rear end/ front end you have. Like 8.8 9" and so one. Hope that helps you some.
I see you're new, so :wel: from NC!! Stop by The Welcome Mat and introduce yourself.

Your information is not necessarily correct. You can have a 3.3M Ford 9-inch or a 3.3M Dana 44. It applies to the larger trucks, also, so you could have a 38M Rockwell or a 38M Spicer. There's really no correlation there.
Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools talk because they have to say something.--Plato
Why is it that there's seldom time to fix it right the first time, but there's always time to fix it right the second time???

That's not an oil leak :nono: That's SWEAT from all that HORSEPOWER!! :thup:
Post Reply