410 not that easy

Engine, ignition, fuel, cooling, exhaust

Moderators: Ranchero50, DuckRyder

User avatar
DuckRyder
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4925
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 3:04 pm
Location: Scruffy City
Contact:

re: 410 not that easy

Post by DuckRyder »

428 Cobra Jet sizes, 427 are bigger at 2.19/1.73

The 427 valves won't clear, but the CJ did on mine.

Some guys say they notch the bores, but I did not have to.
Robert
1972 F100 Ranger XLT (445/C6/9” 3.50 Truetrac)

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -- Jeff Cooper
nevrenufhp
New Member
New Member
Posts: 134
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 8:51 pm
Location: California, Modesto
Contact:

Post by nevrenufhp »

I like that 300 pounds of torque at 1000 rpm!
67 F100, 300(Offy intake, Edelbrock 500, 274*/.518" lift cam, heddder, duraspark & Summit CD ign), 4spd, power steering swap, front disc and hydroboost.
08 VW R32
increase diesel fuel rate site:
http://www.freewebs.com/nevrenufhp/index.htm
User avatar
68F250
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1174
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 3:26 pm
Location: California, Brea

re: 410 not that easy

Post by 68F250 »

I like how you go from 300 to 418 ft.-lbs. from 1000 to 1500 rpm, that's 90% of the peak torque! Ya can't get that out of a 390, it will put a big smile on your face at every stoplight.
Barry

"Are you gonna make it all 220?"
"Yeah 220, 221, whatever it takes."
User avatar
HOWDY69
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 484
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 6:31 pm
Location: California, Sacramento

Post by HOWDY69 »

This is a 410 engineering update. We are going with the 2.08/1.64 valves and have found a used Performer RPM intake to use instead of iron. It’s rated for 1500 to 6500 and will match well with the stock heads. It sounded kind of high RPM to me. I asked if the Performer 390, which is the OEM replacement according to Edelbrock, would be better and was told the runners were too small for 416 ci unless someone just wanted pure low-end torque and the Performer RPM would give a better balance of torque and power.

Carburetor is a Holley 4150 650 cfm with electric choke and vacuum secondaries.

BTW the estimated volume on the 381P piston after installation is 18 cc’s. So once again you were very close Duckryder. They will be cc’ed after installation and I will let you know how they prove out.
69 F250, FE Specialties 410, CJ Valves, RPM Intake, Holley 4150,......10 Smiles per gallon
71 Clydesdale in many pieces; 302 roller motor waiting impatiently
User avatar
DuckRyder
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4925
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 3:04 pm
Location: Scruffy City
Contact:

re: 410 not that easy

Post by DuckRyder »

Performer RPM should work fine for you power wise, however:

That manifold moves the carb back about an inch, based on the fact that the additional height of my Blue Thunder (which does not move the carb back) causes a stock air cleaner to be very tight on the lip in the firewall, I would caution that if you intend to run a standard air cleaner it may cause clearance issues.

If you plan to run a typical open element it is no problem, but if you want to run a stock aircleaner check it out.
Robert
1972 F100 Ranger XLT (445/C6/9” 3.50 Truetrac)

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -- Jeff Cooper
User avatar
HOWDY69
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 484
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 6:31 pm
Location: California, Sacramento

Post by HOWDY69 »

Thanks for the heads up on the air cleaner. When I dropped the truck off today I talked to Tom about zero decking. He said he was not planning on doing it to my engine because a pre-machining mock-up was not in my budget. He said it also caused problems with matching the intake to the heads. He will have the machine shop square the decks. After he installs the pistons he will cc them and the combustion chambers and go from there. With the 1.660 pistons and the theoretical 10.17 deck height the piston to deck would be 0.032. Machining the deck will reduce that somewhat. Sounds like we are still on track for 9.5 or less. I should have the sonic test results in a few days.
69 F250, FE Specialties 410, CJ Valves, RPM Intake, Holley 4150,......10 Smiles per gallon
71 Clydesdale in many pieces; 302 roller motor waiting impatiently
User avatar
pat67shorty
New Member
New Member
Posts: 150
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:42 pm
Location: Washington, Tumwater
Contact:

Post by pat67shorty »

Honestly, with 9.5:1 I don't think you'll have too much trouble with 87.

The 9.5:1 car 390 in my truck happily munches on 87 while I flog it, and I have yet to hear it ping, let alone knock.
'67 SWB, 1970 car 390, Edelbrock Streetmaster intake, MSD 6AL, 780 Holley, Hedman headers, 2.5 duals, 3.54 D44 L/S, C6.
User avatar
HOWDY69
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 484
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 6:31 pm
Location: California, Sacramento

Post by HOWDY69 »

Now that I have made it through the first 500 miles on the new 410FE I would just like to thank everyone for your help and support. Your advice and experiences really helped me make some critical decisions. Here is what I ended up with.

360 block bored 0.030 over
428 crank 20/20
OEM rods ARP bolts
Sealed Power 381P pistons
CJ valves, mild porting
Performer RPM intake
Holley 4150 carb
FPA Try-Y's (future installation)

Compression is 9.6 to 1
Temperature is 160 with 4 row radiator
(I am sure it will go up this summer)
Oil pressure is 3/4

I still have a lot of work to do on the truck but I feel like I have crossed a major hurtle with the engine rebuild. Thanks again for all the help and support.
69 F250, FE Specialties 410, CJ Valves, RPM Intake, Holley 4150,......10 Smiles per gallon
71 Clydesdale in many pieces; 302 roller motor waiting impatiently
User avatar
CJ,s 67 F100
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 464
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 7:23 pm
Location: Texas

Post by CJ,s 67 F100 »

I think the cut off on reg. unleaded is 9.5-1 . Our 9.4-1 390 runs great on Reg. Unleaded
User avatar
69rangerman
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 620
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 3:40 pm
Location: Florida, Ocala

Post by 69rangerman »

:eek: WOW! Now I know why you 390 guys are all torqued (get it..) about your motors. I could not believe the size of those pistons on duckryders hood! My itsy bitsy 302's barely qualify as pistons in comparison. Cool to see advice and support manifested in a working motor.

Tom
"O say, does that star spangled banner yet wave? Oer the land of the free and the home of the brave?" It does at my house! God bless America!
waynaferd
New Member
New Member
Posts: 122
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 8:43 pm
Location: Stinkin Lincoln Maine!

Post by waynaferd »

So you have a 428 crank and 390 pistons, and regular 360 rods, correct?

And if you don't mind, how much was everything (parts, machine work, etc)?

Thanks!!
A 72 F-250 Hi-Boy "project" ( that means sitting untouched for 3 or so years)

And a little 94 F-150 Flareside, 7" higher and 35's...
User avatar
suavematt
New Member
New Member
Posts: 166
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 12:18 pm
Location: Gainesville, FLORIDA
Contact:

Re: 410 not that easy

Post by suavematt »

:yt:

~ 8) Suave'
Name's Matt. I'm a southern' Boy with a love for the Lord & Carb'd Ford V8's hahaha... Anything else you wanna know... Ask ; )


1979 F-100 Super-Cab/Long-Bed Work-Truck [300 I6, C4, Ford 9" Rear]
1993 Ford Ranger, single-cab short-bed [2.3L 4-banger, 5spd trans, 7.5 rear... Full-time Convertable ; ) ]
1972 Ford Mustang [351-Cleve' (being built, still workin' on it), C4 auto, Ford 9" Rear]
User avatar
DuckRyder
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4925
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 3:04 pm
Location: Scruffy City
Contact:

Re: 410 not that easy

Post by DuckRyder »

428 Crank
390/428 Rods (no 352/360 rods)
390 TRUCK pistons or some of the aftermarket for this application (Ross, Probe, and JE/SRP make them)

You will have to either internally balance ($) the 428 crank, or run a 428 flexplate/flywheel.
Robert
1972 F100 Ranger XLT (445/C6/9” 3.50 Truetrac)

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -- Jeff Cooper
Post Reply