PISTONS
Moderators: Ranchero50, DuckRyder
- court1100f
- New Member
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:21 pm
- Location: Humble,Tx 77396
- Contact:
Re: PISTONS
yes but you'd also need the 390s Rods to do that conversion the 360/390 both share the same bore 4.05" it the stroke of the crank that determines your final displacment I.E. 3.52'" =360Cid and 3.78" =390Cid and 3.98" =410Cid all three of these displacements are derived from the same block and all three share the same bore diameter the 3.98" Crank came in the 410/428 engines just for you to play with heres a formula for calculating end displacement based on bore and strok and number of cylinders the formula is BorexBorexstrokex.7854x number of cylinders so for example to get your 360s displacement the formula would look like this 4.05 x4.05 x 3.52 x .7854 x 8=360.71 so actually it's a 361 or atleast almost anyway
-
- New Member
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 10:02 pm
Re: PISTONS
i WAS UNDER THE ASSUMPTION THAT THE CONNECTING RODS ARE THE SAME LENGTH, THAT THE PISTONS ARE DIFFERENT 352 AND 360 USE A FULL SKIRT WERE AS 390 DONT???????
- court1100f
- New Member
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:21 pm
- Location: Humble,Tx 77396
- Contact:
Re: PISTONS
nope and it's more complicated than that to my knowledge from what I've read theres skirted and non skirted 360 pistons the rods are different and you need the right ones to go with the 390 rotating assembly
- DuckRyder
- Moderator
- Posts: 4925
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 3:04 pm
- Location: Scruffy City
- Contact:
Re: PISTONS
360's use the "thin" & "long" rod, you need 390 rods.
Robert
1972 F100 Ranger XLT (445/C6/9” 3.50 Truetrac)
"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -- Jeff Cooper
1972 F100 Ranger XLT (445/C6/9” 3.50 Truetrac)
"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -- Jeff Cooper
- sideoilerfe
- Blue Oval Fanatic
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:04 pm
- Location: Oregon, Portland
Re: PISTONS
yes 360's used the full skirt where as the 390's do not.jay1213 wrote:i WAS UNDER THE ASSUMPTION THAT THE CONNECTING RODS ARE THE SAME LENGTH, THAT THE PISTONS ARE DIFFERENT 352 AND 360 USE A FULL SKIRT WERE AS 390 DONT???????
Side oiler FE, see if you can catch me!!!
1970 F250 4x4 390/4spd
1968 F250 4X2 360/C6/No Rust!
1970 F250 4x4 390/4spd
1968 F250 4X2 360/C6/No Rust!
- fomocoguy
- 100% FORDified!
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:04 pm
- Location: St. Louis, MO
Re: PISTONS
This is not always true. I am turning a 1976 360 into a 390 as we speak, and the original 360 pistons do not have a full skirt. I am using a 390 crank and rods paired with the 360 pistons. This will bring the pistons up to zero deck height and give me the same compression ratio as a 390 car engine.sideoilerfe wrote:yes 360's used the full skirt where as the 390's do not.jay1213 wrote:i WAS UNDER THE ASSUMPTION THAT THE CONNECTING RODS ARE THE SAME LENGTH, THAT THE PISTONS ARE DIFFERENT 352 AND 360 USE A FULL SKIRT WERE AS 390 DONT???????
SOME 360's HAVE A FULL SKIRT; SOME DO NOT. You just have to pull it apart and see. 360 and 390 rods are different lengths.
Joe
1971 F100 flareside 8ft
1964 Chrysler New Yorker Town and Country wagon
2006 Dodge Ram 2500 cummins
2005 Ford Ranger
1971 F100 flareside 8ft
1964 Chrysler New Yorker Town and Country wagon
2006 Dodge Ram 2500 cummins
2005 Ford Ranger
- sideoilerfe
- Blue Oval Fanatic
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:04 pm
- Location: Oregon, Portland
Re: PISTONS
Perhaps the later 360's didn't have the full skirts but the earlier ones did.
Side oiler FE, see if you can catch me!!!
1970 F250 4x4 390/4spd
1968 F250 4X2 360/C6/No Rust!
1970 F250 4x4 390/4spd
1968 F250 4X2 360/C6/No Rust!