How satisifed are you with your headers

Engine, ignition, fuel, cooling, exhaust

Moderators: Ranchero50, DuckRyder

Post Reply
Rick
New Member
New Member
Posts: 60
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:41 pm
Location: North Carolina

How satisifed are you with your headers

Post by Rick »

I am going to install headers on my truck and would like to know what brand of headers you are running and any positive or negative issues.
My Truck: 1968 2 wheel drive short wheel base F100, 390 engine with C8AE-H heads, C6 column shifted transmission, Bendix power steering gear and power brakes. Thank you in advance for taking time to respond.
User avatar
Joshpow
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1790
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 10:43 am
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: How satisifed are you with your headers

Post by Joshpow »

I love my Dynomax. They seal great. The only problem is the small block clearance issues. All headers hit on a smallblock. I don't believe FE's or others have the problem. That isn't specific to brand of headers though. All have the same problems.
Josh

72 F-100 Ranger XLT SWB
71 F-100 Custom SWB
67 F-350 Dually Dump
02 F-250 Stroke
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2972100
User avatar
td
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1007
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 8:44 pm
Location: Tennessee, Lexington

Re: How satisifed are you with your headers

Post by td »

Rick,

i bought mine from summit, they are headman elite and ive been completely satisfied with them. of course im running a 302 but here's a link to the same header for your application. the ball and socket style flange seals great with no gasket to blow :thup:
http://store.summitracing.com/partdetai ... toview=sku

mine.
Image
User avatar
bumpside
New Member
New Member
Posts: 219
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 6:14 pm
Location: Flemington, NJ

Re: How satisifed are you with your headers

Post by bumpside »

302 again, I bought the Sumit brand headers. They fit well without hitting anything. They seal well on the heads, no leaks.
And they are under $100.00 . The only improvment I would like is the ball and socket connection to the rest of the exhaost. The standaed flange works well and doesn't leak.
1972 SWB Ranger XLT
`We'll hold the distinction of being the only Nation in the history of the world that ever went to the poor house in an automobile.' (Will Rogers)
User avatar
Joshpow
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1790
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 10:43 am
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: How satisifed are you with your headers

Post by Joshpow »

I like those balland flange! I may go for a set when I change mine. I guess clearance issues aren't as common as I thought. I was just going by what everyone told me. Oh well mark me up another wrong I guess.
Josh

72 F-100 Ranger XLT SWB
71 F-100 Custom SWB
67 F-350 Dually Dump
02 F-250 Stroke
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2972100
User avatar
td
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1007
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 8:44 pm
Location: Tennessee, Lexington

Re: How satisifed are you with your headers

Post by td »

Joshpow wrote:I like those balland flange! I may go for a set when I change mine. I guess clearance issues aren't as common as I thought. I was just going by what everyone told me. Oh well mark me up another wrong I guess.
no josh your not wrong, ive had clearance problems with every set of small block headers ive put on these trucks. this set im running now was a nightmare for sure with the 3'' collectors.i Had to cut clearance in the cross member to put pipe on them.
User avatar
Joshpow
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1790
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 10:43 am
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: How satisifed are you with your headers

Post by Joshpow »

I see! That's my plan too.
Josh

72 F-100 Ranger XLT SWB
71 F-100 Custom SWB
67 F-350 Dually Dump
02 F-250 Stroke
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2972100
User avatar
My427stang
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 502
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 8:52 am
Location: Omaha, NE

Re: How satisifed are you with your headers

Post by My427stang »

Hedmans are where its at for these FE bumps.

I have run Hookers, Blackjack, Hedman, and Cyclones on our trucks, and the two Hedmans fit the best, followed by Hookers.

When mine was 302 powered, I had a set of Doug Thorleys, they were decent too, but not sure if they are around and I like the Hedmans too much to chance
71 F-100 SB 4x4, 461 FE, Edelbrock Pro-flo 4, 4 speed, 4 inch softride lift, all poly bushings, integral PS, most mods installed since the 80's
70 Mustang Sportsroof 489 FE, EFI, TKO-600 5 speed, 4.11s
Engine building by-appointment only--30+ years, specializing in strong street pump gas FEs
User avatar
bumpside
New Member
New Member
Posts: 219
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 6:14 pm
Location: Flemington, NJ

Re: How satisifed are you with your headers

Post by bumpside »

td wrote:
Joshpow wrote:I like those balland flange! I may go for a set when I change mine. I guess clearance issues aren't as common as I thought. I was just going by what everyone told me. Oh well mark me up another wrong I guess.
no josh your not wrong, ive had clearance problems with every set of small block headers ive put on these trucks. this set im running now was a nightmare for sure with the 3'' collectors.i Had to cut clearance in the cross member to put pipe on them.
Mine cleared the first cross member right under the pan. However, I did have trouble with the pipes clearing the trans cross member. What I ended up doing was turning the trans crossmember upside down and bolting it to the bottom of the frame rail. I also had to weld a perch for the trans mount to bolt to so it would reach the trans again. It took maybe an hour to do it.

Sooooooo.... The headers did fit to the first cross member, but the exhaust pipes would not clear the trans cross member without fliping it over. My mistake :oops: :)
1972 SWB Ranger XLT
`We'll hold the distinction of being the only Nation in the history of the world that ever went to the poor house in an automobile.' (Will Rogers)
User avatar
rubiranch
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 321
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 12:26 am
Location: Utah

Re: How satisifed are you with your headers

Post by rubiranch »

I am satisfied with the Hedmans on my 72. 390, C-6 and PS. They fit fine and were easy to install.

I am on my 4th set of Hedmans on my 79. They seem to last about 60,000 miles.
72 F-250 CS XLT 390 C-6 4.10 40k miles
You don't shoot to kill, you shoot to stay alive.
I don't carry because I have to, I carry because I get to.
http://www.fordification.com/galleries/ ... ?album=514
User avatar
td
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1007
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 8:44 pm
Location: Tennessee, Lexington

Re: How satisifed are you with your headers

Post by td »

bumpside wrote:
td wrote:
Joshpow wrote:I like those balland flange! I may go for a set when I change mine. I guess clearance issues aren't as common as I thought. I was just going by what everyone told me. Oh well mark me up another wrong I guess.
no josh your not wrong, ive had clearance problems with every set of small block headers ive put on these trucks. this set im running now was a nightmare for sure with the 3'' collectors.i Had to cut clearance in the cross member to put pipe on them.
Mine cleared the first cross member right under the pan. However, I did have trouble with the pipes clearing the trans cross member. What I ended up doing was turning the trans crossmember upside down and bolting it to the bottom of the frame rail. I also had to weld a perch for the trans mount to bolt to so it would reach the trans again. It took maybe an hour to do it.

Sooooooo.... The headers did fit to the first cross member, but the exhaust pipes would not clear the trans cross member without fliping it over. My mistake :oops: :)
bumpside,

the cross-member ive always had clearance issues with is the one between where the radius arms attach to their frame bkts. the trans member is behind it. the collectors on all ive seen rest right on top of the one im talking about. just wanted to verify which one you meant? did you not have your exhaust pipe custom mandrel bent at a exhaust shop? i would think the wouldn't of had any problems bending the pipe to clear the trans cross-member :?
User avatar
bumpside
New Member
New Member
Posts: 219
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 6:14 pm
Location: Flemington, NJ

Re: How satisifed are you with your headers

Post by bumpside »

td,

I thought it would be easier to turn the trans cross member over for clearence with 3" pipes. By doing that, I run straight to the rear axle with out any bends, just turndowns at the end. On the cross member your talking about, I have between 1/4 and 3/8 inch clearance. I also have a torque limiting brace on the left side of the motor to stop engine movement, so the headers don't hit from motor movement anyway. I guess maybe I got lucky with the header fit. They are the only ones I have had on this truck.

Terry :)
1972 SWB Ranger XLT
`We'll hold the distinction of being the only Nation in the history of the world that ever went to the poor house in an automobile.' (Will Rogers)
User avatar
td
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1007
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 8:44 pm
Location: Tennessee, Lexington

Re: How satisifed are you with your headers

Post by td »

:thup: O ok
User avatar
DuckRyder
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4925
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 3:04 pm
Location: Scruffy City
Contact:

Re: How satisifed are you with your headers

Post by DuckRyder »

I have Hooker Competition.

I'm satisfied, but would probably go with Hedmans if I did it over again. There is always FPA if you want to get really serious.
Robert
1972 F100 Ranger XLT (445/C6/9” 3.50 Truetrac)

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -- Jeff Cooper
saidyene
New Member
New Member
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 8:20 am
Location: Dahlonega, GA

Re: How satisifed are you with your headers

Post by saidyene »

I was considering hooker for mine but it seams the headman are getting better reviews. What makes them better? I dont really know much about headers but i do understand a good bit of tech talk so please be detailed.
Post Reply