390 vs 460

Engine, ignition, fuel, cooling, exhaust

Moderators: Ranchero50, DuckRyder

User avatar
DuckRyder
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4925
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 3:04 pm
Location: Scruffy City
Contact:

re: 390 vs 460

Post by DuckRyder »

410.

since you have to replace the crank anyway.

http://survivalmotorsports.com/FEKitTech.html
Robert
1972 F100 Ranger XLT (445/C6/9” 3.50 Truetrac)

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -- Jeff Cooper
User avatar
convincor
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1511
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:05 am
Location: Connecticut

re: 390 vs 460

Post by convincor »

I actually have a local parts supplier that list a reground 428 crank for $338.With bearings.. Clevite piston set for $207. I have a set of rods. :maybe:
68 Custom Cab Shorty, 390, C6, 9"-3.50:1 Currie T/L
"Still Plays With Trucks"
http://s101.photobucket.com/albums/m41/convincor/F100/
User avatar
ford4x4fun
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1468
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:38 pm
Location: Cadiz, KY
Contact:

Post by ford4x4fun »

I have a 71 F100 Long Bed 4x4, My Dad rebuilt the 390 in it, and it is pushing about 350 HP. In a tight spot, I could break everything in the drive train with a quick tap of the gas peddle. And I still have room under the hood to work. I can put my hands and a wrench on almost every bolt without a big fuss. The 460 sounds cool too, but I know how much power I have, and it is more than plenty! My :2cents:
CNR Radio Instructor
US ARMY Retired
1971 Ford F100 4x4 (390)
2015 Ford F250 Crew Cab 6.7l
User avatar
sideoilerfe
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 804
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:04 pm
Location: Oregon, Portland

Post by sideoilerfe »

averagef250 wrote:Go with the 390.

The 390 built with the right parts to 350HP and 450 TQ or so is more than enough to break every part in your drivetrain.

If you want to solidify in your head why a 390 beats a 460 in a pre-79 4x4 go work on each of them in a truck. The FE fits. The 460 does not. Well, it does, but not well at all. Headers fit horribly unless you go fenderwells. 460 adds 200+ pounds to the front of the truck
:yt:

Enough said. Dustin has enough experience to know! My friend has a '72 hi boy and a 460 and my 390 is just as powerful!!! I'd say FE or bust....and it's lighter!
Survivalmotorsports.com .
Side oiler FE, see if you can catch me!!!

1970 F250 4x4 390/4spd
1968 F250 4X2 360/C6/No Rust!
User avatar
F10YRB12118
New Member
New Member
Posts: 45
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 11:30 pm
Location: California, Fort Tejon
Contact:

re: 390 vs 460

Post by F10YRB12118 »

Gentlemen,

Great advice from all. Going to a 410 would give me the performance with some respectful torque I'm thinking. With the 428 crank I'd save some $s and under a rand is even better.

I really appreciate all you help. I've never rebuilt an engine and getting ideas from those of you who have is very helpful.

I'll have to post some pics when I'm done!!

Thank you.
Sean
1942 Chevy Truck, 1.5 Ton, G503
1967 F100 352 LWB Custom Cab
1969 Bronco Wagon 302
1972 F100 360 SWB 4x4 XLT
1972 F250 360 LWB Parts Donor
1973 F250 360 LWB 4x4 Donor?
1979 F250 460 Parts Donor
User avatar
sideoilerfe
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 804
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:04 pm
Location: Oregon, Portland

re: 390 vs 460

Post by sideoilerfe »

Yeah, i'd sell the 460 to fund your FE build. FE's are respectable work horses. :2cents:
Side oiler FE, see if you can catch me!!!

1970 F250 4x4 390/4spd
1968 F250 4X2 360/C6/No Rust!
User avatar
F10YRB12118
New Member
New Member
Posts: 45
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 11:30 pm
Location: California, Fort Tejon
Contact:

re: 390 vs 460

Post by F10YRB12118 »

Thanks again for all your help.

Here is an image of a what would be my "1st" 4x4 "project." This is from OIF I. I think you all might enjoy.

We called it "War Mule"

Image taken in Jan 04 CSC Cedar II.

Yours,
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Sean
1942 Chevy Truck, 1.5 Ton, G503
1967 F100 352 LWB Custom Cab
1969 Bronco Wagon 302
1972 F100 360 SWB 4x4 XLT
1972 F250 360 LWB Parts Donor
1973 F250 360 LWB 4x4 Donor?
1979 F250 460 Parts Donor
User avatar
RedneckTexan
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1102
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 6:58 pm
Location: The backwoods of TEJAS!

Post by RedneckTexan »

COOL! that's a neat "war mule" ya got there! :thup: :thup:
John

68 F-100~68 F-350~69 F-250~69 F-100
76 F-150~78 bronco~78 bronco

http://oldfordcrewcabs.com/
User avatar
Blue2Ghost
New Member
New Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 2:54 pm

re: 390 vs 460

Post by Blue2Ghost »

My 2 cents worth: I own a 1984 F-250 4-speed flatbed. I had a stock 390 in it for about 130,000 miles (yes I know it's not original) and then I happened to buy a ultra low miles ambulance with a non-catalyst 460 in it. I thought it would be a significant power upgrade so I swapped it into my F-250. While the 460 is very strong, it actually has a little less power than my 390. I have since put around 180,000 on the 460 with no issues, but I was surprised at the similarity in power, both in acceleration and pulling. And also, yes, I currently have 512,000 miles on the truck. It originally had the 6.9L diesel.
User avatar
averagef250
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 4387
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:58 am
Location: Oregon, Beavercreek

Post by averagef250 »

If it's any help The very mild 390 I had in my 7000 pound 70 F-250 4x4 easily had the respect and praise of anyone who rode in it or had half an idea what it takes to pull serious weight over mountain passes at the speed limit. I've never ridden in a 460 powered anything that could best an FE for brute low end power. I've heard a lot of talk from 460 believers and any one of them shut right up when riding in my 390 powered highboy towing a trailer up a grade. That engine did not notice towing 8000 pounds. It had no problem spinning 35" tires through 3rd and got squirly in direct on the freeway if it was wet.

The beauty of that engine was the simple fact it was put together with what are considered by most to be the "b*stard" FE parts- D2 heads, performer intake, 9:1 hyper pistons, 901 cam.
1970 F-250 4x4 original Willock swivel frame chassis '93 5.9 Cummins/Getrag/NP205/HP60/D70
User avatar
F10YRB12118
New Member
New Member
Posts: 45
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 11:30 pm
Location: California, Fort Tejon
Contact:

re: 390 vs 460

Post by F10YRB12118 »

Gentlemen,

The 410 sounds like a popular alternative. I'm definitely going with the FE. I like the old school.

As Averagef250 said he didn't see much difference in power between the 460 & 390 in his truck. It would be a lot of work with not much trade.

What do you all think of Cams? Crane hydraulic roller cam or 410 Survival Motors or Edelbrock Performer RPM Cam.

What about a Crankshaft? 390 or 428? Any suggestions?

Yours,
Sean
1942 Chevy Truck, 1.5 Ton, G503
1967 F100 352 LWB Custom Cab
1969 Bronco Wagon 302
1972 F100 360 SWB 4x4 XLT
1972 F250 360 LWB Parts Donor
1973 F250 360 LWB 4x4 Donor?
1979 F250 460 Parts Donor
User avatar
F10YRB12118
New Member
New Member
Posts: 45
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 11:30 pm
Location: California, Fort Tejon
Contact:

re: 390 vs 460

Post by F10YRB12118 »

Friends,

Just to let you know, I have been given a couple of prices to rebuild my 360 into a 390. I am looking at about $1000 to $1500 to rebuild by 360 into a 390 short block.

I thank everyone that offered their advice and experiences. That is what makes this forum so valuable to me. I'm new and trying to learn, with your help it makes my learning curve a lot easier.

Thank you,
Sean
1942 Chevy Truck, 1.5 Ton, G503
1967 F100 352 LWB Custom Cab
1969 Bronco Wagon 302
1972 F100 360 SWB 4x4 XLT
1972 F250 360 LWB Parts Donor
1973 F250 360 LWB 4x4 Donor?
1979 F250 460 Parts Donor
User avatar
willowbilly3
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1591
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 7:38 pm
Location: Black Hills

re: 390 vs 460

Post by willowbilly3 »

I'm lazy so I vote for the least amout of work. But if you just have both engines, you will have to dump some $$ into the 390 to make it pull like a stock 460. Lots of these trucks running around with the big 429/460 engines so don't be scared of that if it's what you want. Forget headers on a 4x4 anyway, my experience with them is high maintainence.
Great ideas have always encounter violent opposition from mediocre minds.
User avatar
sideoilerfe
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 804
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:04 pm
Location: Oregon, Portland

Re: re: 390 vs 460

Post by sideoilerfe »

willowbilly3 wrote: I vote for the least amount of work.
I agree. so FE is the way to go.
willowbilly3 wrote:But if you just have both engines, you will have to dump some $$ into the 390 to make it pull like a stock 460.
Not true. The 390 has a 3.78 stroke. The 460 has a 3.87 stroke. FE's have gobs of low end anyway...
willowbilly3 wrote:Forget headers on a 4x4 anyway, my experience with them is high maintainence.
Highly agree! :2cents:
Side oiler FE, see if you can catch me!!!

1970 F250 4x4 390/4spd
1968 F250 4X2 360/C6/No Rust!
User avatar
sideoilerfe
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 804
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:04 pm
Location: Oregon, Portland

Re: re: 390 vs 460

Post by sideoilerfe »

8)
Last edited by sideoilerfe on Mon Aug 25, 2008 10:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Side oiler FE, see if you can catch me!!!

1970 F250 4x4 390/4spd
1968 F250 4X2 360/C6/No Rust!
Post Reply