1969 Ford Crew Cab / Cummins Project

Post progress reports on your project truck(s)

Moderator: FORDification

Post Reply
User avatar
HRDROKN
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 384
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 3:39 pm
Location: California, Vacaville

re: 1969 Ford Crew Cab / Cummins Project

Post by HRDROKN »

Alright......

She finally sits on her own four feet again! And of course for all you pic junkies.....

Image

Image

Image

8)
'69 Ford Cummins Crew Cab... Built 6BT main & head studs, ported & oringed head, springs, Ti retainers, marine cam, tweaked P7100, 4K gov kit, NV4500 w/1.375" input, Southbend 3600# DD clutch, NP271 w/SYE, D60 HP front, high steer, 16" coilovers & 4-link, D80 w/disc rear, 4.10's & LSD, spinning 38" x 14.fiddy's on classic slots..... more coming!


http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... hp?t=23267
dcbullet
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 698
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 6:28 pm
Location: Oceanside, CA

Post by dcbullet »

Mother...of...God...

What a monster!
User avatar
RedneckTexan
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1102
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 6:58 pm
Location: The backwoods of TEJAS!

re: 1969 Ford Crew Cab / Cummins Project

Post by RedneckTexan »

AWE-SOME!!!!!! :thup: :thup: :thup: :thup: :thup: :thup:

When your done, will you build me the twin to this truck? :D
John

68 F-100~68 F-350~69 F-250~69 F-100
76 F-150~78 bronco~78 bronco

http://oldfordcrewcabs.com/
User avatar
HRDROKN
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 384
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 3:39 pm
Location: California, Vacaville

Hey Dustin.....

Post by HRDROKN »

Just attempted to swing my NV4500 into place so that I could get to fabricating the new cross member, but it didn't go! It appears that the input shaft is bottoming out on the end of the crank. Taking a measurement showed that the Input shaft is approximately .750" too long. Input shaft total length is 7.750" and the bellhousing depth to crank end (no pilot bearing) is 7.000" .

My only guess at this point (and My question) is that the bellhousing adapters are different between automatics and manuals??? Or is it that my adapter being a 1993 is too shallow??? Are 1994 and up deeper???

Looks like my adapter is about 1.250" deep... if that helps.

I found an 03-06 adapter that looks to be right about .750" deeper... any known problems with a later model adapter??? Starter???

Thanks!

Image

Image

:o
Last edited by HRDROKN on Tue Aug 12, 2008 3:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
'69 Ford Cummins Crew Cab... Built 6BT main & head studs, ported & oringed head, springs, Ti retainers, marine cam, tweaked P7100, 4K gov kit, NV4500 w/1.375" input, Southbend 3600# DD clutch, NP271 w/SYE, D60 HP front, high steer, 16" coilovers & 4-link, D80 w/disc rear, 4.10's & LSD, spinning 38" x 14.fiddy's on classic slots..... more coming!


http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... hp?t=23267
User avatar
averagef250
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 4387
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:58 am
Location: Oregon, Beavercreek

Post by averagef250 »

89-93 adapters are different from the 94-02 adapters.

You can buy a conversion bellhousing from AA to make the NV4500 work with the 89-93 stuff, you can machine an adapter plate to make the NV and old adapter/bellhousing work together or you can go to a 94-02 adapter, flywheel and clutch.

I don't know about the 03-06 stuff. I know commonrail block adapters are machined to seal the rear of the cam with an O-ring.

The thing to keep in mind with the 03 and up dodge cummins stuff is that when cummins went to commonrail in '03 they also switched every engine they make other than the dodge engines over to rear geartrain. Knowing that, there's a good chance the 03 and up dodge stuff is not like anything else.
1970 F-250 4x4 original Willock swivel frame chassis '93 5.9 Cummins/Getrag/NP205/HP60/D70
User avatar
HRDROKN
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 384
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 3:39 pm
Location: California, Vacaville

re: 1969 Ford Crew Cab / Cummins Project

Post by HRDROKN »

Thanks Dustin!

:thup:
'69 Ford Cummins Crew Cab... Built 6BT main & head studs, ported & oringed head, springs, Ti retainers, marine cam, tweaked P7100, 4K gov kit, NV4500 w/1.375" input, Southbend 3600# DD clutch, NP271 w/SYE, D60 HP front, high steer, 16" coilovers & 4-link, D80 w/disc rear, 4.10's & LSD, spinning 38" x 14.fiddy's on classic slots..... more coming!


http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... hp?t=23267
User avatar
HRDROKN
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 384
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 3:39 pm
Location: California, Vacaville

re: 1969 Ford Crew Cab / Cummins Project

Post by HRDROKN »

So on to other stuff then....... while I look for a new bellhousing adapter.

I have decided to eliminate the springs in the steering knuckle with these pieces. They use a set screw and heavy washer to pre-load the nylon cone.

Image

Image

Image

:wink:
'69 Ford Cummins Crew Cab... Built 6BT main & head studs, ported & oringed head, springs, Ti retainers, marine cam, tweaked P7100, 4K gov kit, NV4500 w/1.375" input, Southbend 3600# DD clutch, NP271 w/SYE, D60 HP front, high steer, 16" coilovers & 4-link, D80 w/disc rear, 4.10's & LSD, spinning 38" x 14.fiddy's on classic slots..... more coming!


http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... hp?t=23267
User avatar
HRDROKN
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 384
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 3:39 pm
Location: California, Vacaville

re: 1969 Ford Crew Cab / Cummins Project

Post by HRDROKN »

The tie rod ends for the drag link are from a Cheby application and were used in place of heim joints due to the angle from the pitman arm and steering nuckle...

Image

Image

Image

8)
'69 Ford Cummins Crew Cab... Built 6BT main & head studs, ported & oringed head, springs, Ti retainers, marine cam, tweaked P7100, 4K gov kit, NV4500 w/1.375" input, Southbend 3600# DD clutch, NP271 w/SYE, D60 HP front, high steer, 16" coilovers & 4-link, D80 w/disc rear, 4.10's & LSD, spinning 38" x 14.fiddy's on classic slots..... more coming!


http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... hp?t=23267
User avatar
HRDROKN
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 384
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 3:39 pm
Location: California, Vacaville

re: 1969 Ford Crew Cab / Cummins Project

Post by HRDROKN »

I'll use 3/4" heims for the tie rod... drilled out the 5/8" taper to 3/4"...

Image

Image

Image

:D
'69 Ford Cummins Crew Cab... Built 6BT main & head studs, ported & oringed head, springs, Ti retainers, marine cam, tweaked P7100, 4K gov kit, NV4500 w/1.375" input, Southbend 3600# DD clutch, NP271 w/SYE, D60 HP front, high steer, 16" coilovers & 4-link, D80 w/disc rear, 4.10's & LSD, spinning 38" x 14.fiddy's on classic slots..... more coming!


http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... hp?t=23267
User avatar
71PA_Highboy
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 923
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 11:32 am
Location: Denver of the East

re: 1969 Ford Crew Cab / Cummins Project

Post by 71PA_Highboy »

Remind me to stay away from you when you are driving that truck.

SRE (Heim joints) have no place on a street vehicle in a single shear application. A hard hit and you are gonna pop that heim and have no steering.

The Chevy 1 ton TREs would have been a much better choice.

JMHO.

Eric
Got Ford?
2 EarlyBroncos (68,69)
2 Classic Mustangs (69,70)
1 F250 4x4 (71) - OB - 360, NP435, D24, HPD60 4.10, D60,
1 94 Ranger, 2.3, 5spd
1 Lincoln Mark VIII
User avatar
averagef250
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 4387
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:58 am
Location: Oregon, Beavercreek

Post by averagef250 »

Eric's got a good point. I'd want tie rods for the street too.

What is the purpose of eliminating the kingpin taper spring?
1970 F-250 4x4 original Willock swivel frame chassis '93 5.9 Cummins/Getrag/NP205/HP60/D70
User avatar
HRDROKN
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 384
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 3:39 pm
Location: California, Vacaville

Post by HRDROKN »

averagef250 wrote:Eric's got a good point. I'd want tie rods for the street too.

What is the purpose of eliminating the kingpin taper spring?
What I'm hearing is that running poorly balanced 38's to 44's can cause the "death wobble" or shimmy due to the unbalanced weight compressing the spring each rotation. Seemed to make sense from theory, really don't know if it is a real problem with big tires? On my jeeps, running big 35x14.50's I have not even had to balance the tires as the rotational speed is quite a bit slower at speed. Of course I don't run my jeeps at 80+ either. I'm certain this truck will see more than 80 mph on occasion.

:?
'69 Ford Cummins Crew Cab... Built 6BT main & head studs, ported & oringed head, springs, Ti retainers, marine cam, tweaked P7100, 4K gov kit, NV4500 w/1.375" input, Southbend 3600# DD clutch, NP271 w/SYE, D60 HP front, high steer, 16" coilovers & 4-link, D80 w/disc rear, 4.10's & LSD, spinning 38" x 14.fiddy's on classic slots..... more coming!


http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... hp?t=23267
User avatar
HRDROKN
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 384
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 3:39 pm
Location: California, Vacaville

Post by HRDROKN »

averagef250 wrote:Eric's got a good point. I'd want tie rods for the street too.
IMO... It would seem to me that if heims can handle the forces of big tires on the rocks with hydraulic steering rams attached to the tie rods, then it would seem to me that street duty wouldn't be an issue?

Hmmm.... looking at the desert racers it looks like they are using heims for control arms as well as steering geometry.... and those boys launch those trucks!!!


:wink:
'69 Ford Cummins Crew Cab... Built 6BT main & head studs, ported & oringed head, springs, Ti retainers, marine cam, tweaked P7100, 4K gov kit, NV4500 w/1.375" input, Southbend 3600# DD clutch, NP271 w/SYE, D60 HP front, high steer, 16" coilovers & 4-link, D80 w/disc rear, 4.10's & LSD, spinning 38" x 14.fiddy's on classic slots..... more coming!


http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... hp?t=23267
User avatar
1971ford
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 5565
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 1:05 pm
Location: Placerville CA

Post by 1971ford »

HRDROKN wrote:
Hmmm.... looking at the desert racers it looks like they are using heims for control arms as well as steering geometry.... and those boys launch those trucks!!!


:wink:
yup, heims are everywhere on desert racing trucks. and they obviously take a horrible beating. ive never heard of anyone breaking a heim on the forums or at the races.
-Ryan
User avatar
rjewkes
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3711
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:09 am
Location: Missouri, Webb City
Contact:

Post by rjewkes »

Heim? what is this? will i need it on my 70 crew 4x4? most 4xing will be on ice and snow and occassional mudding/rock crawling.
"It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt." - Mark Twain
'70 f250 4x4 Crew cab 460/C6 '72 F100 390/C6 9.8 MPG AVG. '89 Mercury Cougar LS Dual Exh. V6 . 18.9 MPG AVG. In Town.
Image
I don't want to give em a heart-attack. That is what would happen if I answered the door in the buff. Heck it almost scares me to death when I step out of the shower and look in the mirror.~Mancar1~
fuelly.com
Post Reply